Thursday, October 25, 2012

VINDICATION

ESSEX COUNTY — A veteran State Police trooper who said he was retaliated against after complaining the division failed to appropriately investigate claims such as racial discrimination and sexual harassment was awarded $1.06 million Wednesday by an Essex County jury.

Michael Reimer, a lawyer for retired Detective Sgt. 1st Class Brian Royster, said the jury found the State Police and Superintendent Col. Rick Fuentes violated the state Conscientious Employee Protection Act, intended to protect whistle-blowers from retribution for speaking out.

The jury awarded Royster $200,000 for emotional distress, $305,000 in lost pension and $55,000 in back pay, Reimer said. Royster was also awarded $500,000 because the State Police failed to accommodate his disability, as required under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act. Royster said he suffers from ulcerative colitis, a type of inflammatory bowel disease.

"I was vindicated by a jury of my peers and that’s what this was about," said Royster, who retired last year after 25 years on the force. He now works as an assistant professor in the criminal justice department at St. Peter’s University in Jersey City.

Reimer said Royster’s request for punitive damages was denied. A spokesman for the Attorney General’s Office, Paul Loriquet, said the civil verdict was under review and a decision on whether to appeal had not yet been made.

In the lawsuit, filed in 2005 in Superior Court in Essex County, Royster, 48, of Bloomfield, alleged cases pending with the Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action unit were stalled without reason and those troopers accused of misconduct were allowed to retire rather than be disciplined.

Royster, who was assigned to the unit from 2002 to 2004, said claims of discrimination that might result in civil lawsuits would not be investigated. He said the State Police and state Attorney General’s Office worried about creating a paper trail that might be used against them.

Royster, who is African American, also raised concerns with superiors that white troopers found guilty of offenses such as sexual harassment were disciplined less severely than black troopers, according to the lawsuit. The Attorney General’s Office discouraged him from reporting the disparate treatment, he alleged.

Claims of racial discrimination were nothing new at the time. The State Police were under federal oversight for racial profiling from 1999 to 2009. The division was previously under watch by the federal government from 1975 to 1992 for discriminatory hiring practices.

In December 2003, Royster met with Fuentes and then-Capt. Gayle Cameron to complain about the stalled EEO/AA cases, discrimination and disparate treatment, as well a bowel condition that he had developed because of a hostile and stressful work environment.

Cameron said the allegations would be investigated, and both she and Fuentes’ office asked Royster to accept a position with the State Police academy, the lawsuit said. Royster declined the promotion and said he later learned it was offered because officials feared he might sue.

Royster alleged that despite Cameron’s assurances, his allegations of stalled cases and disparate treatment were never investigated. Cameron retired as a lieutenant colonel in 2008 and was appointed earlier this year as the Massachusetts gaming commissioner.

As a result of his complaints, Royster said, he was passed over for promotions and targeted with an unfounded internal complaint intended to hold up his career. The internal investigation concluded in 2005 because there was insufficient evidence, the lawsuit said.

Royster said that despite his health condition, he was transferred to a task force in Union County that did not provide him easy access to any facilities, which he said was done out of retaliation for his previous complaints.

Royster was eventually promoted in 2009.



8 comments:

RH said...

Hi, I enjoy reading your site! Is it okay if you consider linking to my website on your page? Please email me back.

Thanks!

Harry
harry.roger10 gmail.com

Anonymous said...

So this is what you were talking about. Congratulations. I wonder how much taxes the government asked out of that award. In all seriousness though, all I can say is interesting. I do not have enough knowledge or experience to even comment on this case. I would say that although it took a long time, justice was served. Patience is truly a virtue. How did you feel about this whole trial? Are you satisfied with the result? What were your expectations? How do you feel about it now? I look forward to your answers. Thank you. - AVRB5611

Anonymous said...

SK 4540

Racial profiling happens in every job. I'm sorry to hear about what you had to go through when you were on the force. Although, I am not shocked about this situation. Police forces racial profile regular citizens on a daily basis. Today, it is pinned on police brutality towards African Americans.

Anonymous said...


Thanks, for sharing some of your life experience. I could only admire the courage to share some aspect of your life. From what I could gathered about this life experience, is that speaking with the truth is not always an easy path to take. Nonetheless, people need to be truthful not only others but to themselves about their own believes. Staying silent is like supporting the injustice and it will make some individuals live with regret. The regret in this particular case could be of possibly not helping others in similar situations to speak out and to not stay silent. Being silence could eat you alive. In addition, speaking with the truth about this kind of matters could make the people in the position of authority aware of things going on; by making public certain things could also reinforce that you will be heard. Thus, it could be another step of making progress with the criminal justice system, so that things like this could be taken seriously into account for the benefits of all.


F.C 8245

Anonymous said...

The actions of the white police troopers was unacceptable and should have not have happened in the first place. Sadly, even though most don’t wish to accept it even in our current society there are many situations similar to Royster’s. Even though there he was able to gain financial justification there are still emotional and physical damage that cannot be so easily fixed in a court session.
KD 2222

Anonymous said...

I admire you for taking action. Many people subsequently stay quiet about the injustice that they have sustained. Thank you for being that one voice, you have set an example for other races that are treated so vulgarly. The Equal Employment Act in 1972, prohibited discrimination in hiring on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It's unfortunate that 30 years after this act that this incident happen to you. It just goes to show that racial discrimination is still alive and is just as worst as before. Although you have received some compensation for such heinous injustice it still does does heal the emotional and physical scars, the constant court dates, fees and overwhelming amount of stress. Many ethnicities commend you for taking a stand, you have surely set a precedent in future cases to come.

CC 9859

Unknown said...

Not many people in your situation would have made the same decision.. your courage is admirable. Hopefully the changes you sought have been made and your peers are reaping the benefits. I'm going to go out on limb however and assume not much has changed....

Q said...

Sad to see that a few generations later racism is still out here and alive.